Dr. Haider Shah

Opinion is the medium between knowledge and ignorance (Plato).


Leave a comment

OVER A COFFEE: The perils of manufacturing justice, The Daily Times, 21 March, 2015

Accountability for all crimes is what we need. Incomplete and partial accountability is no accountability at all

 Dr. Haider Shah

For the past few days, the bells have tolled in the media for the leaders of MQM. Being a vehement supporter of the rule of law and a regular critic of the politics of MQM, I should be filled with a blissful feeling that finally judgment day has arrived. But my happiness is blotted by a feeling of discomfort as I can see some manufacturing as well. My optimism tells me that finally truth will prevail in a long drawn out battle but my scepticism alerts me that it might end up a pyrrhic victory. The conspiracy theorist whispers in my ears that this is in fact a targeted operation to dislodge a politician from a seat for which a new aspirant is registering his claim, masquerading as a law enforcement operation. As a friend puts it, the fast paced thriller looks like it is bulldozing the way to installing a New Kaka in Karachi.

A law enforcement operation against criminal activities is an initiative that enjoys the support of all sections of society. When the arrests of the alleged killers in famous cases, like those of Zahra Shahid Hussain and Parween Rahman, are splashed as breaking news all over the national media, we feel as if we are entering a new era. An era in which, in Faiz’s words: “kuch apni saza ko phuncheingei, kuch apni jaza lejaengei” (some will receive penalties, some will be rewarded). But then the sceptic in me becomes a bit restless. Why now and so suddenly? In all these years, even when Army chief Musharraf and his raft of Army monitoring teams in all public sector organisations was in total control of the country, the killers were not apprehended.

The revelations of Soulat Mirza are dramatic and shocking but they were already in the public domain. While his allegations may be used by the law enforcement agencies to book some big politicians, some disturbing side effects may outweigh the benefits. In their enthusiasm to settle scores with the leadership of MQM, they have rent the institutional processes to punish culprits asunder. If a convict shares confidential information with the law enforcement agencies, such information should be used to arrest the accused and to have them convicted in a court of law. It is unprecedented to see a carefully recorded and edited video message of a convicted murderer being shown on electronic media as a breaking news item. Never in the past has a convicted murderer addressed the nation like a celebrity. Although I do not have high opinions of the people named by Soulat Mirza, I am perturbed by the manner in which this whole confession speech was made available to the addressees.

Accountability for all crimes is what we need. Incomplete and partial accountability is no accountability at all. If past crimes are being investigated and those who planned them are getting nabbed, then the organisers of the 12th May massacre also need to be arrested and brought to justice. Because Musharraf publicly took ownership of the proceedings of that fateful day in Karachi, impartial accountability demands that he should also be arrested along with all the others that facilitated the bloodstained events of that day. In the same Karachi, a murder attack was carried out on Hamid Mir in broad day light. No one knows what happened to the judicial commission and police investigations about that event. And everyone knows what happened to Geo for naming the suspect. Ironically, it was the same channel that relayed the murder accusations of Saulat Mirza against political leaders. It is interesting to see how quickly patriotism and villainy become interchanged in Pakistan. There is a perception in certain quarters that schemers had been working behind the scenes to persuade Altaf Hussain to vacate the party chief slot for Musharaff. After a stubborn refusal, the current media focused trial aims to teach him a lesson. This story may actually be a figment of the imagination, but the manner in which the electronic media has been used doesn’t help in dispelling the perception that MQM has fallen foul of the security establishment.

Releasing video messages to media channels in a clandestine manner has been the hallmark of terrorist outfits, like the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan. When the leaders of the state opt for similar techniques, institutional development stalls and gives way to the whims of powerful personalities. It is the sad saga of our political history that the military first spends 10 years trying to enforce an Islamic system in the country and promote jihadism in every nook and corner, then it calls for 10 more years to clean up the mess created by its earlier rule. Currently, a popularly elected government is leading the country in theory, but it is anyone’s guess who is really calling the shots. Both the civilian leaders and military institutions can restore the confidence of independent observers in the integrity of the political system if no wilful overstepping of the due process of law is done and accountability is ensured across the board.


Leave a comment

OVER A COFFEE: Higher education in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, The Daily Times, March 07, 2015

The control freaks that we are, from parents to religious sermonisers, from stiff neck civil and military bureaucrats to ambitious politicians, we want every individual and organisation to be under our thumb

Dr Haider Shah

In the print media reports of a fracas over strategic management in higher education between the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government, vice chancellors (VCs) and the teaching staff have been making headlines for quite some time. On account of my association as a student and teacher with four higher education institutions in the UK such stories of wrangling for control are difficult to digest.

Institutions, both divine and secular, reflect the social norms and attitudes of a society. While pondering over pomposity I fly back to the late 1990s when I was pursuing an MBA course as a Chevening scholar. The British Council arranged a visit for all scholarship holders to Cambridge University. Standing in the lawn along with other students who had come from various universities I eagerly awaited the arrival of the then UK government’s commonwealth minister. Suddenly, someone from amongst the guests took the mike and, after introducing himself as the minister wished us all the best and joined us for a group photograph. Astounded by the simplicity of the function I thought of our official functions where the chief guest, as a norm, arrives one hour late and then the rituals of power play follow. First comes a maulvi for talawat (recitation of Quranic verses), then comes a naatkhwan (singing of hymns) and then the senior most officer lauds the graciousness of his majesty the minister for taking out time from his “gonagoon masroofiat” (hectic schedule).

The control freaks that we are, from parents to religious sermonisers, from stiff neck civil and military bureaucrats to ambitious politicians, we want every individual and organisation to be under our thumb. According to reports appearing in the media, the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government has relentlessly been pursuing changes in the strategic management of the higher education sector by introducing amendments to the Universities Model Act. Teaching faculties are opposing these changes as they do not want that major decision-making shifts from elected bodies to the government. Beggars cannot be choosers. That is perhaps the principle with which the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government views the independence of universities.
From the ideal state of Plato in ancient Athens to the modern welfare state of present day Europe, education plays a pivotal role. The UK’s universities, both ancient and new, are not owned or run by the government but are independent legal entities. While all universities receive some public funding, the government does not manage this money directly but works through a series of independent funding councils. So, even for strategic oversight the government does not use direct funding as a lever of control. An official guide on the UK higher education sector identifies the governance structure of UK universities as a central factor in its record of international success in research, scholarship and education: “UK universities are autonomous and independent institutions with a well-deserved and jealously guarded reputation for intellectual and academic freedom.” From my own personal experience I can state with confidence that strategic and operational level management starts and ends with the VC and the governing body where government is not represented. Unlike Pakistan, there is no umbilical cord between a university and the government. Chancellor is a ceremonial title often bestowed upon someone with a distinguished career. However, the titleholder has no role in the managerial matters of a university.

The previous ANP government, despite many failings, must be credited with giving a growth spurt to higher education in the province by launching new universities. The Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Universities Model Act, 2012 streamlined the affairs of the sector after extensive deliberations with all stakeholders. While no significant addition or improvement has been witnessed during the two-year tenure of the new Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government, it focused its energies on amending the existing two-year-old act. VCs of all public sector universities have expressed their apprehensions over unilateral amendments proposed by the government, which, they believe, are maliciously motivated. The Peshawar University Teachers’ Association (PUTA) has also severely condemned the proposed amendments, threatening nationwide closure of public sector universities if the independence of universities is diluted through amendments by the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government. The representative bodies of university faculties argue that with the proposed amendments the appointment of VCs would become wholly political, which, in turn, would be catastrophic to the autonomous nature of the higher education sector in the province. If the amendments are scrutinised, this apprehension does not seem to be wholly unjustified as out of proposed amendments the majority focus on appointments, removal and functions of VCs.

There is an emerging chorus even here in the UK about making higher education more accountable by adopting managerialism. But this is not being done by usurping the powers of the universities’ administration by the government. Instead, greater quality assurance requirements have been introduced through the higher education authority. Governments do not poke their long noses to improve seats of learning and scholarship. While writing these lines a story has appeared in the national press, catching my attention. It has been alleged in the story that a young MNA from the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government passed three failed papers in a single day after undue pressure was applied. The story may turn out to be untrue but if governments enjoy greater levers of control such instances of misuse of power will become more commonplace. Hence, it is in the interest of all stakeholders that the higher education sector be left fully autonomous and only quality assurance related demands are placed before universities’ top management.